« Cowboy Legs on an English Menu | Main | Malaysian babes at the Faces website »
Engadget and DapReview on a Bad Row
By admin | March 22, 2006
Be careful !!! Engadget might steal your story and not mention a link back to you. They are one of the biggest Gadget Blogs around and mine you…so far Gizmodo has been jolly good tho. Beware the blogging police knocking down on Weblogs and Engadget’s door. They should play nice.
Be wary…. So far, this websites have been a victim of Engadget’s tricks :
Airing Dirty Laundry: Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident source
UPDATE : 22 MAR 2006
Just to let everyone know..I’m neutral on this issue. !
UPDATE : 28 MAR 2006
Changed title name. Dont want to get on Peter’s black list
Topics: Blogging, Gadgets, Tech News |


March 22nd, 2006 at 1:44 am
March 22nd, 2006 at 8:52 pm
March 26th, 2006 at 3:29 am
March 26th, 2006 at 3:30 am
March 27th, 2006 at 12:14 am
Peter is still in damage control mode I see.
To clarify, the issue is not relevent with Engadget and ALL blogs, just some - including DAPreview. Peter and Ryan have a personal problem with us dating back to 2004, as I explained in the article.
So, do you buy their response?
“Ooops, we didn’t really mean to do that, it was all an accident.”
Let’s review the facts. They took the time to go back and edit an article that was already published, from another author. They took the time to rewrite the credit, removing all reference to DAPreview. They took the time to edit the picture and repost it, cutting out the DAPreview logo. They did all this - for no apparent reason - and without checking a single fact?
Keep in mind, out of the 100+ items that they credited to us before August 2005, only a handful of our images were ever watermarked. The few that were, had been originals of ours taken at CES or CeBIT… never once have we watermarked somebody’s else’s photo.
Their explanation is ridiclous, but what else can they say? We didn’t expect them to admit anything.
Anyway… we had to call them out, but it’s done and we’re moving on.
Thanks for bringing this issue to light on your blog.
March 28th, 2006 at 4:01 am
March 28th, 2006 at 4:06 am